Government Accounting Office Report on Disability Progams

Federal Disability Programs: More Strategic Coordination Could Help Overcome Challenges to Needed Transformation Summary: In 2003, GAO designated federal disability programs as a high-risk area because federal disability programs remained grounded in outmoded conceptsthat have not been updated to reflect the current state of science, medicine, technology, and labor market conditions. In addition, the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) faced management challenges, especially with their disability claims processing. Further, disability experts have expressed concerns about the level of coordination among the many federal agencies that providebenefits and services to individuals with disabilities. GAO was asked to determine: (1) what steps SSA and VA have taken to modernize theirdisability programs and (2) to what extent SSA and VA coordinate withother federal agencies that provide services to individuals withdisabilities. To do this, GAO reviewed literature, agency strategic plansand performance and accountability reports, and interviewed agency officials. SSA and VA have taken some initial steps to recognize a more modern concept of disability, but both agencies still encounter challenges in fully assessing an individual's capacity to work and in addressing claims processing problems. SSA and VA have revised some eligibility criteria to reflect medical advances and to support beneficiaries' efforts to returnto work and achieve self-sufficiency. However, their revisions to eligibility criteria fall short of fully incorporating a modern understanding of how technology and labor market changes should impacteligibility for disability benefits and return-to-work rates remain low. The low return-to-work rates may be due, in part, to the timing in which certain supports are offered to beneficiaries. However, the timing ofservices are constrained by several factors, including program design,laws, and the agencies' limited span of authority over benefits andservices offered by other agencies. Finally, although SSA and VA are taking steps to address management challenges, both agencies continue to experience delays in processing disability claims and persistent backlogs. SSA and VA disability programs partner with other federal agencies that provide services to individuals with disabilities on specific initiatives, but government wide coordination of cross-cutting programs is lacking. For example, SSA and VA have partnered with specific agencies to support employment-related services, conduct research, and improve the integrityand operation of their disability programs, among other things. While interagency partnerships may help to improve some programs, individuals with disabilities and the programs serving them continue to operate without a centralized federal strategy or a coordinating entity to ensure federal policies, services, and supports are aligned. To view this report go to: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08635.pdf